Google Glass and the "iPhone" Moment

The article delves into the hype surrounding Google Glass, questioning its potential for widespread adoption compared to the success of the iPhone. The author, Andrew Chen, argues that while Google Glass presents a promising concept in wearable computing, its current limitations might hinder its widespread acceptance.

• Chen draws a comparison between Google Glass and the Apple Newton, a visionary device ahead of its time, but ultimately unsuccessful.
• He posits that Google Glass, like the Newton, could be a precursor to a future iteration that truly revolutionizes the wearable computing landscape.

The Price of Innovation: Comparing Google Glass to the "iPhone"

The article highlights the significant price difference between Google Glass and smartphones like the iPhone. It emphasizes the need for Google Glass to deliver substantial benefits over existing technology, considering its cost.

• Chen contends that at a price point of $1,500, Google Glass needs to offer a significant upgrade over existing smartphones for users to justify the expense.
• The article points out that in the future, Google Glass will face competition from other wearable devices, including smartwatches, further complicating its market position.

Use Case Analysis: Google Glass vs. the "iPhone"

The author meticulously examines the use cases showcased in Google Glass marketing materials, comparing them to the capabilities of modern smartphones, including the iPhone.

• The article lists a number of tasks that can be performed with Google Glass, such as checking the time, recording videos, sending messages, and searching Google images.
• However, the author argues that most of these tasks can be done with existing smartphones, like the iPhone, with no noticeable advantage provided by Google Glass.
• He identifies specific situations where Google Glass might offer a superior experience, such as taking POV photos and navigating with maps, but questions whether these benefits are sufficient to justify the cost and potential drawbacks.

The Challenge of Voice Input: A "iPhone" without Touch

The article explores the limitations of voice input as a primary interface for Google Glass, drawing parallels with the shortcomings of handwriting recognition on the Apple Newton.

• Chen expresses skepticism about the current state of voice recognition technology on both Android and iOS, emphasizing the challenges in composing messages using voice commands.
• He points out that voice input is prone to errors and inconsistencies, especially in noisy environments.
• The article suggests that Google Glass might struggle to compete with smartphones, like the iPhone, which offer more reliable touch-based interfaces.

The Future of Wearable Computing: "iPhone" for the Future?

Despite his skepticism, the author expresses hope that Google Glass, despite its current limitations, could be a stepping stone toward a future where wearable computing becomes mainstream, just like the iPhone revolutionized mobile technology.

• He acknowledges the potential for Google Glass to evolve and improve with future iterations.
• Chen emphasizes the need for developers to focus on creating innovative use cases that address the limitations of Google Glass and take advantage of its potential for wearable computing.
• The article concludes by urging the technology industry to focus on creating seamless and compelling user experiences, rather than simply producing gadget porn.