Summary of The Rise of the French Fry Cartel

  • jacobin.com
  • Article
  • Summarized Content

    French Fries Antitrust Lawsuit Market Consolidation

    The Rise of the French Fry Price-Fixing Conspiracy

    The article details a shocking discovery: four companies control nearly all of the $68 billion frozen potato market, leading to accusations of price-fixing and causing a significant increase in the cost of french fries across the nation. A sports bar owner's tweet about unusually synchronized price increases by major suppliers ignited a firestorm, eventually leading to numerous antitrust lawsuits.

    • Four major suppliers (Lamb Weston, J.R. Simplot, McCain Foods, and Cavendish Farms) allegedly colluded to raise prices simultaneously.
    • The price increases disproportionately affect smaller businesses and consumers.
    • The impact extends beyond restaurants; the price of french fries in fast-food chains has also seen significant increases.

    The French Fry Cartel and Market Consolidation

    Decades of consolidation in the frozen potato industry have resulted in an oligopoly, where a small number of companies wield immense power. This consolidation allowed the alleged price-fixing scheme to succeed and lead to skyrocketing french fries prices. The lawsuits reveal the extent of the four companies' control, which extends to about 97% of the market.

    • Lamb Weston and McCain Foods alone control a significant portion of the market.
    • Mergers and acquisitions significantly reduced competition, paving the way for price manipulation.
    • The dominance of fast-food chains further contributed to the consolidation, creating a reliance on these few suppliers.

    The Impact of French Fry Price Hikes on Consumers

    Consumers are directly feeling the effects of the alleged price-fixing, experiencing significant increases in the price of french fries at both fast-food restaurants and smaller establishments. The cost increases are not just limited to french fries. The price hikes have a broader impact across the food service industry.

    • McDonald's french fry prices have increased significantly since 2014.
    • Hash brown prices at various fast-food chains have more than doubled.
    • Smaller restaurants and bars are struggling to maintain their margins due to increased costs.

    The Role of Information-Sharing Platforms in the French Fry Market

    The article highlights the use of a third-party data analytics platform, PotatoTrac, as a potential facilitator of tacit collusion. The sharing of sensitive business information, including pricing and costs, among competitors through such platforms makes coordinated price increases more likely without overt agreements.

    • PotatoTrac, operated by Circana, provides market data to all four major companies.
    • This data sharing allegedly allows the companies to monitor each other's pricing strategies and maintain high prices without explicit agreements.
    • This method of collusion avoids the legal repercussions of overt price-fixing.

    Antitrust Lawsuits and the Future of the French Fry Industry

    Numerous antitrust lawsuits have been filed against the four major frozen potato companies, accusing them of anticompetitive practices and price-fixing. These lawsuits represent a challenge to the dominance of these few players and the high prices of french fries. The outcome of these cases could have significant implications for the future of the french fry industry and food industry regulation.

    • Lawsuits allege that the companies coordinated price hikes through data sharing and industry meetings.
    • The lawsuits represent a legal challenge to the alleged potato cartel's activities.
    • The outcome will determine whether the companies face penalties and whether it will deter similar behavior.

    The Broader Context of Market Consolidation in the Food Industry

    The situation in the frozen potato market is not unique. The article points to similar trends of market consolidation across various sectors of the food industry, leading to price increases for consumers and reduced choices for farmers. The frozen potato example serves as a case study for a broader issue across food.

    • Many food industries show high levels of concentration, with a few dominant players controlling a large share of the market.
    • This consolidation reduces competition and can lead to higher prices and less choice for consumers.
    • Farmers and suppliers often lack leverage in negotiating prices with powerful buyers.

    Impact on Potato Growers and Smaller Businesses

    The market consolidation has negative consequences for potato farmers and smaller businesses. Farmers have little negotiating power with only four major buyers, leaving them vulnerable to price manipulation. Small businesses such as restaurants and bars suffer from higher input costs, reducing profit margins and potentially affecting their sustainability.

    • Potato growers have limited options for selling their produce.
    • Smaller businesses face increased costs and reduced profitability due to the price hikes.
    • The lack of competition hurts both farmers and small businesses.

    The Response from the Frozen Potato Companies

    Lamb Weston, one of the defendants, denied the allegations and stated their intention to fight the lawsuits. Other defendants did not respond to requests for comment. This lack of response further fuels concerns about the validity of the claims and the potential for continued price manipulation.

    • Lamb Weston, J.R Simplot, McCain Foods and Cavendish Farms are all named defendants.
    • The companies deny the accusations of price fixing.
    • The outcome of the lawsuits will be crucial in determining the future of the market and the price of french fries.

    Discover content by category

    Ask anything...

    Sign Up Free to ask questions about anything you want to learn.