Publishers across all industries, from news to music, are grappling with the changing landscape of content consumption. They lament that consumers are no longer willing to pay for content. However, the author argues that consumers never truly paid for content, rather they paid for the medium in which it was delivered.
The author suggests that the term "content" itself is misleading. It implies a generic, undifferentiated product, which is how both publishers and consumers perceive it. In essence, "content" is information that people don't truly need.
The author questions the viability of traditional music publishing models. He argues that platforms like iTunes function more like tollbooths than stores. They control access to music and charge consumers small fees, essentially taxing them rather than selling them content.
The author outlines two potential paths for publishers: give content away for free and generate revenue indirectly, or find ways to embed content in products that consumers will pay for.
The author emphasizes that traditional publishers are unlikely to be the ones to succeed in the new landscape. He believes that new forms of music and media will emerge, taking advantage of technology to offer consumers something they couldn't have before.
The author compares the music and publishing industries to the software industry. He acknowledges that software companies can charge high prices because their customers are often businesses that face significant penalties for using pirated versions.
The author concludes by emphasizing the importance of adapting to change. He believes that the future of music and publishing will be shaped by innovation and new ways of providing value to consumers. Those who embrace new technologies and create compelling experiences will be the ones who thrive in this evolving landscape.
Ask anything...