This essay explores the question of why Lisp, a programming language known for its power and flexibility, remains relatively niche despite its quality. The author uses the analogy of Jane Austen's novels, arguing that while Lisp may seem more challenging on the surface, its underlying strength and elegance make it a worthwhile investment.
The article highlights the role of libraries and managers in the popularity of programming languages. It states that the availability of libraries can be a key factor in choosing a language. The argument is made that developers often prefer popular languages because there are more libraries available for those languages.
The author draws a parallel between Lisp and Jane Austen's novels, suggesting that both are considered challenging but ultimately rewarding. Lisp's quality, according to the author, lies in its power and effectiveness.
The essay emphasizes that the importance of quality in programming languages cannot be understated. The author suggests that while popularity and libraries can drive language adoption, quality should be the ultimate deciding factor.
The article concludes by discussing the future of Lisp and other languages that may not be mainstream favorites. It asserts that while the popularity of libraries and manager preferences can heavily influence language adoption, quality and value will always have their place.
The essay highlights the influence of popularity and libraries on the adoption and evolution of programming languages. It emphasizes that while popularity can create a cycle of self-reinforcement, it doesn't always equate to quality.
Ask anything...