The article delves into the reasons behind the decline in popularity of Facebook apps among developers. It explores how the once-booming platform has lost its allure for developers who are now focusing on mobile platforms. The article highlights several factors contributing to this shift, including lack of virality, rising ad rates, constant retooling, competition, and the finite nature of the Facebook feed. The author also examines the potential for Facebook to regain its appeal among developers.
The article points out the shift in developer focus towards mobile platforms. Mobile platforms like iOS and Android are now seen as offering more opportunities for growth and sustainability. This shift has been fueled by the success of mobile apps like those developed by Supercell, which have achieved valuations far surpassing those of Facebook apps. The article also highlights the perceived stability of mobile platforms compared to the constant changes and updates on the Facebook platform.
The article discusses how the Facebook platform has become less conducive to viral growth for apps. The early days of the platform saw apps like iLike and Zynga achieve rapid growth through methods like pre-checked friend invites and other viral tactics. However, Facebook has since scaled back these features, making it more difficult for apps to achieve sustained virality. The author argues that the decline in viral opportunities has made it harder for Facebook apps to acquire and retain users, contributing to their diminishing appeal.
The article explores how rising ad rates on Facebook have affected the viability of Facebook apps. The author notes that developers and advertisers initially benefited from cheap ad inventory on Facebook, allowing them to acquire a large user base at a low cost. However, as ad rates have increased, the profitability of this strategy has decreased. This shift has made it more challenging for Facebook apps to generate revenue through advertising and user acquisition.
The author emphasizes the ongoing retooling required for Facebook apps, often driven by changes to Facebook's APIs. These changes create a "maintenance tax" for developers, requiring them to dedicate resources to keep their apps up-to-date with platform changes. This constant retooling can be disruptive and adds to the perceived instability of the Facebook platform.
The article discusses the growing competition on the Facebook platform, especially in categories like messaging, photos, and social networking. The author points out that Facebook, in some cases, has taken steps to limit competition, such as shutting down apps or restricting their advertising opportunities. This competition, coupled with the finite nature of the Facebook feed, makes it harder for apps to stand out and reach a significant audience.
The author highlights the finite nature of the Facebook feed as a major challenge for Facebook apps. The feed is limited to a specific number of stories, making it a zero-sum game for developers. As users engage with more content on Facebook, including friend activity, pages, apps, and advertisements, the competition for space on the feed intensifies. This saturation can make it difficult for apps to attract attention and reach their target audience.
The article concludes by exploring the potential for Facebook to regain its appeal among developers. The author suggests that Facebook needs to demonstrate the potential for success on its platform by supporting and promoting apps that can achieve substantial growth and sustainability. The author emphasizes the importance of highlighting successful Facebook apps as examples of what's possible on the platform. The article suggests that if Facebook can create compelling success stories, it might rekindle developer interest and encourage new development on the platform.
Ask anything...