This article discusses how often we are presented with limited options, "multiple choice" scenarios, that fail to address the real underlying issues. These options are based on assumptions made before we are even given a choice. We need to challenge these assumptions to reach better outcomes.
The article argues that we're often presented with "multiple-choice" scenarios that restrict our thinking. These scenarios may have limited options and might not address the underlying issues. This is particularly true when we are presented with website options, loan options, or any other pre-defined choices.
The article uses the example of bank loans to illustrate how assumptions can limit our choices. When a bank presents us with different loan options, we should question whether these options are truly in our best interest or if they are designed to benefit the bank.
The article also highlights the importance of questioning assumptions in web design. When a developer presents us with website options, we should not just choose from the provided options. We should question the assumptions about structure, upkeep, user experience, and the suitability of a website as a solution.
The article suggests that "none of the above" can be the best option when we are faced with pre-defined choices. The author advocates for brainstorming, where we can explore new possibilities and discover better solutions that are not constrained by assumptions.
The author argues that questioning assumptions is essential for having a productive day. When we are presented with pre-defined options, we may be limited in our ability to think critically and find the best solutions. Instead, we should take the time to brainstorm and challenge the underlying assumptions.
Ask anything...